By Ibrahim Nasiru
In a recent commentary published by Yusuf Musa of the Centre for Contemporary Studies, the writer raised familiar, recycled questions regarding the political journey and presidential pursuits of Alhaji Atiku Abubakar.
While the critique attempts to clothe itself in academic analysis, it trips over a fundamental misunderstanding of modern statecraft and democratic endurance. To question a leader’s repeated pursuit of the presidency is to misunderstand the very nature of political stamina, national consensus-building, and systemic preparation for governance.
History has proven repeatedly that the presidency of a complex, multi-ethnic nation like Nigeria is not an entry-level job or a prize for accidental populism. It requires decades of deliberate bridge-building across deep cultural, regional, and religious divides.
Look across the globe: Abraham Lincoln failed in multiple senatorial and legislative bids before saving the American Union; Muhammadu Buhari ran three times before clinching the presidency in 2015. In mature democracies, a long-standing presidential pursuit is celebrated as a testament to institutional stamina and a lifelong commitment to a definitive national vision.
The questions Yusuf Musa asks about Atiku’s antecedents are easily answered by the verifiable records of modern Nigerian history. When the writer questions his political network, we must remind him that it was this exact cross-cultural, pan-Nigerian network that laid the foundation for the return to democracy in 1999 under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and later saved the nation’s democracy from the third-term tenure elongation trap in 2006.
Atiku does not need to build new bridges because his existing bridges span from the creeks of the Niger Delta to the arid plains of the Sahel. In a country currently fractured by deep tribal sentiment and polarizing rhetoric, a leader who possesses an organic, decades-old national network is not a liability—he is the ultimate unifying asset.
Furthermore, any honest assessment of Atiku’s executive antecedents reveals a blueprint of economic modernization that Nigeria desperately needs to return to today.
As the head of the National Economic Council during the golden era of Nigeria’s economic growth, he spearheaded the telecommunications revolution, championed the privatization of dead state monopolies, brought in top-tier technocrats to manage the treasury, and successfully cleared Nigeria’s foreign debts.
The current economic crisis under the ruling APC—characterized by a collapsing national grid, hyper-inflation, and a battered currency, is the direct result of a lack of structural economic preparation at the center.
Yusuf Musa and the Centre for Contemporary Studies ask what questions Nigerians must ask about Atiku. The real question Nigerians are asking today is simple: Who possesses the immediate, ready-to-work economic blueprint and the nationwide political stability to rescue Nigeria from economic collapse without spending the first two years learning on the job?
The answer points directly to the Waziri of Adamawa. Atiku Abubakar’s continued political presence is not driven by mere personal ambition, but by a deep-seated institutional duty to correct the structural distortions currently ruining our economy.
While critics focus on how many times he has stepped onto the battlefield, the ordinary citizens, farmers, and business owners of Nigeria are focusing on his unmatched record of economic stability and his unyielding stamina to see this nation prosper.
The questions have been asked, the records are clear, and the blueprint is ready.
Chief Ibrahim Nasiru
Is a Public Affairs Analyst
Call to donate, sponsor posts or for advert placements on our website.
Tel: +234 815 089 8880.
Thank you!

