News Editor
By Ibrahim Nasiru
The recent public declarations by a prominent chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Kano State, Hon. Musa Iliyasu Kwankwaso, regarding the political trajectory of Northern Nigeria ahead of the 2027 general elections, demand a rigorous, issue-based critique.
The core of his argument—asserting that the North lacks a viable presidential contender because the primary opposition figures are “not of the people”—presents a significant distortion of contemporary democratic realities.
In any functional democracy, the mandate to determine who represents the authentic aspirations of the masses belongs exclusively to the electorate at the ballot box, not to partisan gatekeepers attempting to narrow the field in service of the ruling elite.
By attempting to disqualify major political actors while celebrating what he labels as the current administration’s “development dividends,” the APC chieftain has exposed a profound chasm between political rhetoric and the lived socio-economic experiences of ordinary citizens.
To establish an objective critique, one must look closely at the socioeconomic indices currently defining the northern region. To suggest that the populace should content themselves with abstract “dividends” while navigating unprecedented economic headwinds is a failure of analytical objectivity.
The contemporary northern baseline is marked by deep systemic challenges: an agrarian economy severely disrupted by persistent security threats, food inflation figures that strain the survival limits of average households, and a manufacturing sector crippled by high energy costs and infrastructure deficits.
When a political actor speaks of development in a vacuum, completely detached from the reality of closed factories in Kakuri or empty grain markets in Dambatta, such commentary ceases to be analysis and becomes mere partisan public relations.
The ultimate validation of a leader being “of the people” is found in policy outcomes that protect human dignity, restore security, and create economic stability—not in administrative decrees.
Furthermore, the strategic attempt to frame the 2027 electoral contest as a post-regional, performance-driven exercise is an interesting ideological maneuver. While a transition away from identity driven politics toward concrete, issue-based debates is a necessary evolution for Nigeria’s democratic maturity, the ruling party cannot deploy this narrative selectively.
It is historically inconsistent to rely on the complex machinery of regional balancing, internal zoning arrangements, and ethnic coalitions to capture federal power, only to dismiss the validity of regional discontent when those policies fail to deliver localized relief.
Opposition movements, regardless of the geographical origins of their leadership, do not emerge out of a vacuum. They derive their momentum, structural relevance, and public sympathy directly from the governance deficits left by the sitting government.
When a central administration struggles to guarantee a stable electrical grid for northern industrial clusters or fails to secure critical farming corridors from non-state actors, it naturally creates a representation vacuum that alternative political structures are constitutionally mandated to fill.
Moreover, the assertion that prominent northern opposition figures are disconnected from the grassroots represents a fundamental misreading of political mobilization in Nigeria. Grassroots loyalty is not a static commodity owned by any political party or individual; it is dynamic and directly tied to continuous institutional accountability.
Dismissing established figures who command significant, verifiable loyalties across the local government areas of the North as irrelevant ignores the deep-seated institutional frustrations within the region. The modern northern voter is increasingly sophisticated, highly plugged into local language broadcast media, and acutely aware of how policies crafted in Abuja impact the retail price of fertilizer in the local market.
Attempting to manage public perception by declaring the opposition dead before the official electoral cycle begins is an outdated political strategy that consistently underestimates the independent willpower of the electorate.
An objective reading of the geopolitical landscape suggests that the 2027 presidential contest will not be decided by who constructs the most sophisticated media labels, but by a cold, empirical assessment of national well-being.
No political bloc possesses an exclusive monopoly on public sentiment. The vulnerabilities of the ruling party in the North are not driven by the personalities of opposition contenders, but by the direct economic consequences of recent macroeconomic structural adjustments.
The removal of energy subsidies and the liberalization of the foreign exchange market have had profound, far-reaching effects on the purchasing power of the middle and lower classes across the country.
In a region with high demographic pressures and a sensitive agricultural economy, these shocks are amplified. Therefore, any political narrative that tells a struggling population to ignore their immediate economic pain in exchange for future political alignment is bound to face intense intellectual and grassroots resistance.
Ultimately, Hon. Iliyasu Kwankwaso’s commentary should be understood for what it is: an early, protective rhetorical shield designed to establish an elite consensus ahead of an incredibly competitive and volatile electoral cycle.
Northern Nigeria is not a political monolith that can be bargained away or defined by a single media release. The citizens of the region, from the urban artisans to the rural farmers, understand their own interests perfectly because they live with the consequences of state policy every single day.
True leadership and representation are earned through systemic, measurable interventions that lift communities out of poverty and guarantee public safety, not by using media platforms to disqualify political opponents before the official whistle is blown.
The upcoming political contest will ultimately be decided by the voters, who will evaluate every contender based on one simple, universal metric: who offers a credible, practical, and verified roadmap out of the current national economic distress.
Ibrahim Nasiru
Is A Public Affairs Analyst
Call to donate, sponsor posts or for advert placements on our website.
Tel: +234 815 089 8880.
Thank you!
